Ideological Fantasy on Feminist Cliché in Harold Pinter’s The Room: A Žižekian Analysis
Abstract
This study aims to reveal women desires for freedom (without any menace), but she reproduces of male power restraints as it is represented in the drama script of Harold Pinter’s The Room. This research uses Žižek’s critical thinking framework regarding ideology, subject and practice. The approach used in this research is ground theory, the data used are quotations in the script, and the data source is the play script Harold Pinter’s The Room. With interpretation analysis techniques, this research reveals that the great ideals of women’s freedom are fantasmatic. Women’s freedom is an ideological fantasy. This play script reflects women’s freedom but instead explains the reality that they are shackled by patriarchal discourse. Harol Pinter seems to assert male power through the definition of women’s freedom through Rose in The Room. Therefore, the result shows that postmodernist, whose perspective is opposed to hierarchal system, is still trapped in patriarchal perspective
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap hasrat perempuan akan kebebasan (tanpa ancaman), namun ia justru mereproduksi pengekangan kekuasaan laki-laki seperti yang ada dalam naskah drama The Room karya Harold Pinter. Penelitian ini menggunakan kerangka berpikir kritis Žižek tentang ideologi, subjek dan tindakan. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah grounded theory, data yang digunakan adalah kutipan dalam naskah, dan sumber datanya adalah naskah drama The Room karya Harold Pinter. Dengan Teknik analisis interpretasi, penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa cita-cita agung kebebasan perempuan bersifat fantasmatik. Kebebasan perempuan adalah fantasi ideologis. Teks drama ini merefleksikan Kebebasan perempuan tetapi justru menjelaskan realitas bahwa ia terbelenggu oleh wacana patriarkis. Harold Pinter menegaskan kuasa laki-laki melalui definisi kebebasan perempuan melalaui Rose dalam The Room. Dengan kata lain, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa posmodernis, yang notabene menentang hirarki, juga ada yang patriarkis.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Billington, M. (2014). Celebrating pinter. In Pinter at 70: A Casebook. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203952801-30
Card, C. (2003). Introduction: Beauvoir and the ambiguity of “ambiguity” in ethics. In The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir. https://doi.org/10.1017/-CCOL0521790964.001
De Beauvoir, S. (2014). The second sex. In Classic and Contemporary Readings in Sociology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840154-29
Docherty, T., Zizek, S., & Daly, G. (2004). Conversations with Zizek. The Modern Language Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/3738515
Homer, S. (2014). Lacan – the unconscious reinvented. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2014.966593
Lacan, J. (1956). The Psychoses: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. English.
Lacan, J. (1977). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. In Jacques-Alain Miller, trans.
Moleski, J. J. (1980). Dreams of Passion: The Theater of Luigi Pirandello by Roger W. Oliver, and: The Dream Structure of Pinter’s Plays: A Psychoanalytic Approach by Lucina Paquet Gabbard. Comparative Drama, 14(3), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.1980.0038
Oakley, A. (1998). The second wave: A reader in feminist theory. Sociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association.
Pinter, H. (1996). The Room. In Harold Pinter Plays 1. Faber and Faber. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780571292417.00000013
Prentice, P. (2002). The Pinter Ethic. In The Pinter Ethic. https://doi.org/10.4324/-9780203905289
Roblin, I. (2014). The visible/invisible screenwriter: The strange case of Harold Pinter. Adaptation. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apu006
Sakellaridou, E. (1988). Pinter’s Female Portraits. In Pinter’s Female Portraits. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09220-8
Storry, M., & Childs, P. (2016). British cultural identities. In British Cultural Identities. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315440606
Žižek, S. (1999). The Ticklish Subject. Verso.
Žižek, S. (2004). The parallax view. In New Left Review. https://doi.org/10.7551/-mitpress/5231.001.0001
Žižek, S. (2012). Mapping Ideology. Mapping Ideology.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.