3.png){kind=logo}
KAJIAN PESAN TEKS MONOLOGIS WHATSAPP/A STUDY OF WHATSAPP MONOLOGIC TEXT MESSAGE
Abstract
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untukmenemukan dan mendeskripsikan struktur, bahasa yang dipilih untuk mentransmisikan, serta karakter pesan teksmonologis yang ditulis di ruang pesan tiga grup WhatsAppdan sekaligus dikirim ke seluruh anggota grup. Data berupa pesan teks monologis, diperoleh dari sumber tertulis tiga grup WhatsAppberbeda dengan cara membuat tangkapan layar pesan teks yang dipilih. Untuk menguji validitas data dilakukan wawancara dengan informan terkait. Data berbahasa Prancis bersumber dari sebuah grup WhatsAppyang anggotanya berprofesi sebagai guru bahasa Prancis, data berbahasa Indonesia diambil dari sebuah kelompok pengajian, dan data berbahasa Jawa diperoleh dari sebuah grup WhatsAppRW. Data terkumpul dianalisis berdasar perspektif monologis Bakhtin. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pesan teks monologis di dalam ruang pesan grup-grup WhatsApptersebut dituturkan dari penutur yang berwewenang kepada seluruh partisipan di masing-masing grup dalam konteks pemberian informasi. Pesan teks monologis tersebut dapat berstruktur lengkap atau semi lengkap, cenderung disampaikan dalam bahasa yang prestise di lingkungannya, dan secara umum bersifat otoritatif.
Kata kunci: monologis, otoritatif, pesan teks, WhatsApp
Abstract
This studyaimed to discover and describe the structures, language preference, and characters of the monologic text messages written and sent to all group members in the message spaces of three WhatsApp groups.The data that were in the forms of monologic text messages were obtained from three written sources, which were three WhatsApp groups, by taking and saving screenshots of selected text messages. To test the validity of the data, interviews were conducted with informants. The data written in French were collected from a WhatsApp group whose members are the French language teachers. The data written in Indonesian were obtained from a Quran reading group, and those in Javanese were collected from a WhatsApp group of a community unit (RW). All of the collected data were analyzed based on Bakhtin's monologic perspective. The results of the analysis showed that the monologic text messages in the message spaces of the WhatsApp groups were written by speakers (group members) with authority over all other group members in the three WhatsApp groups in terms of providing information. The monologic text messages were either complete or semi-complete, tended to be conveyed in language that showed prestige in each group’s environment, and were generally authoritative.
Keywords: monologic, authoritative, text message, WhatsApp
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Adebola, O. A. (2017). A Linguistics Analysis of WhatsApp Conversation among Undergradiate Students of Joseph Ayo Babolola University. Studies in Language Teaching, 4(3), 393–405.
Alsohaibani, A. (2017). Influence of religion on language use : A sociopragmatic study on the influence of religion on speech acts performance. University of East Anglia.
Anis, J. (2003). Communication électronique scripturale et formes langagières. Rhrt, 33, 1–14. rhrt.edel.univ-poitiers.fr/ document.php?id=547&format=print 1/14
Arifin Z. (2017). The Influence of Arabic on Indonesian Language. Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, 1(1), 77–89.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problem of Dostoevski’s Poetic. Austin: University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, MM. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination (Michael Holquist (ed.)). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bernicot, J., Bert-erboul, A., Goumi, A., & Volckaert-legrier, O. (2015). Analyse d’un corpus longitudinal de SMS produits par de jeunes adolescents. Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique, 63, 1, 15–29.
Botan, C. (1997). Ethics in Strategic Communication Campaigns: The Case for a New Approach to Public Relations. The Journal of Gusiness Communication, 34(2), 188–202.
Brown, P. (2015). Politeness and Language. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, (2nd ed.), (pp. 326-330). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4
Cambridge Dictionary Online. (2020). https://dictionary,cambridge.org/dictionary/english.
Crystal, D. (2004). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eisenstein, J., O’Connor, B., Smith, N. A., & Xing, E. P. (2014). Diffusion of lexical change in social media. PLoS ONE, 9(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0113114.
Enyedy, N., & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). From dialogue to monologue and back: Middle spaces in computer-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(4), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9000-2.
Ghasemi, S. H., & Zareian, G. (2015). The Analysis of Authoritative and Persuasive Discourse of Iranian EFL Teachers and Their Roles at Public and Private Schools. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(2), 91–104.
Holmes Janet. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.
Hosek, V.A., & Handsfield, L.J. (2019). Monological practices, authoritative discourses and the missing “C” in digital classroom communities. English Teaching, 19(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-05-2019-0067.
Jamilah. (2017). Penggunaan Bahasa Baku dalam Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa. Tarbiyah, 6(2), 41–45.
Lopez, C. (2015). Classification des Items Inconnus de 88milSMS: Aide à l’Identification Automatique de la Créativité Scripturale. Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique, 63, 71–86.
Merriam-Webster. (2020). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dialogue.
Meyerhoff, M. (2006). Introducing Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.
Morel, E., & Guryev, A. (2015). Perspectives linguistiques sur les écrits électroniques: des textos aux conversations WhatsApp (Avant-propos). Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique 63, 1-13. https:// www. researchgate.net/publication/.
Mueller, B. G. (2017). Bakhtiniana : Revista de Estudos do Discurso Religious Word as a Variant of ’ Authoritative Word ’ in Bakhtin. Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos Do Discurso, 12(1), 91–109.
Ong, K. K. W. (2017). Textese and Singlish in multiparty chats. World Englishes, 36(4), 611–630. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/weng.12245.
Poedjosoedarmo, S. (2013). Tingkat Tutur Bahasa Jawa. Yogyakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Balai Bahasa Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.
Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2010). Dialogue, Monologue, and Change of Perspective – Three Forms of Dialogicality. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 4(1), 67–79.
Rebourcet, S. (2008). Le français standard et la norme : l’histoire d’une « nationalisme linguistique et littéraire » à la française. Communication, Lettres et Sciences Du Langage, 2, 107–118.
Revita, I., Triclarise, R., Anggraini, N., & Gunawan, F. (2020). Politeness in Domestic Verbal Violence Against Women in Indonesia. Aksara, 32(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.29255/ aksara.v32i1.530.109-118.
Shirkhani, F., Nesari, A. J., & Feilinezhad, N. (2015). Bakhtinian Dialogic Concept in Language Learning Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 510–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.060
Supriadin. (2016). Identifikasi Penggunaan Kosakata Baku dalam Wacana Bahasa Indonesia pada Siswa Kelas VII di SMP Negeri I Wera abupaten Bima Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jime, 2(2), 150–161.
Udasmoro, W. (2020). Discourses of Islam through Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission. Kritika Kultura, 35, 72–94.
Yeo, D., & Ting, S. (2017). Netspeak features in Facebook communication of Malaysian university students. Akademia Baru. 1(1), 81–90.
Yunus, F. (2016). Variasi Bahasa dalam Sosial Media: Sebuah Konstruksi Identitas. International Conference on Language, Culture, and Society 1, 366–372.
Zhang, B. (2013). An Analysis of Spoken Language and Written Language and How They Affect English Language Learning and Teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 834–838.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
